Réalisation:
Gareth EdwardsMusique:
Hans ZimmerActeurs·trices:
John David Washington, Madeleine Yuna Voyles, Gemma Chan, Allison Janney, Ken Watanabe, Ralph Ineson, Marc Menchaca, Sturgill Simpson (plus)VOD (4)
Résumés(1)
Dans un futur proche, les humains et l'intelligence artificielle (IA) se livrent une guerre sans merci. Joshua, un ex-agent des forces spéciales fragilisé par la disparition de sa femme, est recruté pour traquer et neutraliser le Créateur, l'insaisissable architecte d'une IA avancée à l'origine d'une arme qui pourrait mettre fin à la guerre... et détruire l'humanité tout entière. Avec l'aide d'une unité d'agents d'élite, Joshua traverse les lignes ennemies et pénètre au coeur de leur dangereux territoire. Il découvrira bientôt que l'arme funeste qu'il est chargé de détruire n'est autre qu'une intelligence artificelle supérieure qui a pris les traits d'un jeune enfant... (Walt Disney Company France)
(plus)Critiques (12)
Creator was supposed to be the sci-fi hit of the year, but the actual result was almost unwatchable, I suffered unbelievably. In short, Gareth Edwards made a film that, in its style, evoked the Star Wars I hated. I was kind of hoping it would be something along the lines of Independence Day, only with UFOs replaced by an artificial intelligence, but I was sorely mistaken. The film gave me the impression that with 40 minutes gone by, I still didn't know what was going on, there was no introduction to the characters or plot, just one scene after another, with zero viewer engagement. It's like putting episode 6 of a random series and trying to get my bearings on the plot. I was absolutely not entertained by Washington, and the rest of the characters didn't engage me either. The action was dull, I found it to be childish and unexciting. There’s nothing epic, no wow moment, no suspense or atmosphere, just something happening and I didn't really care by halfway through the film, I just wanted it to end. In the end I'm glad I didn't go to the cinema, I've never seen more boring action sci-fi. Disappointment of the year. 3/10.
()
The Creator est un film de science-fiction étonnamment moyen, qui n’attire, ne surprend ni n’impressionne de quelque manière que ce soit par sa mise en images. La plupart des scènes se déroulent dans des huttes situées dans des champs asiatiques et, de surcroît, dans l’obscurité. Quant à la ville futuriste, elle semble tout droit sortie de Blade Runner. Et les lourds engins qui évoluent dans la jungle, d’un film de James Cameron. Mais il y a aussi le problème de John David Washington et de ses capacités limitées en tant qu’acteur : il n’est pas du tout crédible en tant que transfuge convaincu du côté des rebelles, ni en tant que protecteur de l’innocence des enfants. Et il devient lassant à la longue avec le deuil répétitif de son ancienne femme, qui, de plus, ne parvient pas à susciter l’émotion. La seule actrice qui apporte un peu de vie au film est la petite Madeleine Yuna Voyles. Deux étoiles et demie.
()
The Creator est une réussite technique impressionnante malgré son « modeste » budget de 80 millions de dollars et cela vient du fat qu'avec ses visuels somptueux et sa grandiosité, il surpasse tous les sci-fi surproduits et artificiels de ces dernières années. Malheureusement, le même enthousiasme ne peut être partagé pour le scénario, dont la trame est un schéma à la fois éculé et axé sur une multitude de coïncidences et de décisions étranges de la part des personnages, au point qu'en y réfléchissant un peu, on en perd son latin. Et c'est bien dommage, parce que c'est un film qu'on a envie d'aimer.
()
I would never cast young Washington in a leading role again, his acting bad (and I'm taking off one star for that). Otherwise I found this film terribly rich, both visually and emotionally. Gareth Edwards takes us through several locations with a succession of gorgeous images, whether it's a city with dozens of glowing neon signs like in Blade Runner, an Asian landscape where ancient Buddhist culture clashes interestingly with modern sci-fi elements, or the Nomad super spacecraft that Kosinski seems to have invented for Oblivion. I was especially impressed with Asia and how thoughtfully and seamlessly the modern architecture builds on the old buildings, creating such an interesting contrast, and the viewer immersion is incredible. I'm not a fan of AI, but I still didn't mind that Edwards relativizes it and actually puts it in the position of a positive element, just like Blade Runner did 40 years ago, the story thus gets a charge that kept my attention throughout and the few logical lapses didn't ruin it for me. Unfortunately, Edwards is a misunderstood filmmaker. Whether it is with Godzilla, which was a clever homage to the TOHO's films, or here, with the heavy-duty sci-fi that isn't being made much these days. I can only be comforted by the fact that Blade Runner was also critically panned and rejected by audiences in its day, so .... maybe it'll come out in a few decades too, Gareth.
()
And the bubble has definitely burst, so if anyone thought that Gareth Edwards was a directorial genius who was forced out of Rogue One by the evil Disney, and Tony Gilroy only “finished his job for him”, they're in for a nasty clash with reality. The Creator is a beautiful looking film. Physical, full of cool gizmos, gadgets, robots, tanks, rockets, and generally beautiful to look at. It looks very decent in motion too, Edwards is quite adept at war action, and at some points his latest film is reminiscent of Terminator or Avatar; and also of the film we've been looking forward to since the trailers. But then there's a lot of things he can't do. Edwards is a brilliant designer, a decent executor and a lousy storyteller. The longer I watched The Creator, the more I actually felt sorry for him, because behind that veneer of great production design is a woefully banal story, told in an unimaginative and uninteresting way. All the clichés you can think of are there, even the ones that you'll think would be a bit embarrassing if someone used them. Besides, The Creator tries desperately to pretend to be something more and offer some philosophizing in addition to the simple story, but Edwards is woefully unable to work with it. And the more he tries to look clever and multi-layered, the more it becomes apparent how superficial and boring this film is as the running time progresses. Nice, but... shitty, I guess not, but just not very good, either.
()
A film whose creators stutter, can’t remember the beginning of a sentence and constantly run the gamut from “original sci-fi” to clichés and desperate banalities that mask one thing: The Creator says nothing relevant about the phenomenon of AI, which is merely another spectacular decorative element in a film that’s completely dependent on design. Neither the plot nor the world of the film makes sense; given how much space The Creator has, it never creates a coherent and comprehensible world. By comparison, even the didactic Elysium comes across as an engrossing fictional world. Edwards’ directing tries to go in depth, but it rather unconvincingly jumps from details to the big picture, from the present to the past. Some of the actors’ lines really could have been written only by Chris Weitz... Washington plays an utterly two-dimensional character who, through his suffering, only reinforces the impression that The Creator demands grand emotions, to which he is absolutely not entitled. Instead, it has the same feelings of emptiness and lifelessness as Godzilla and Rogue One.
()
An audiovisual feast... A beautiful setting in an underdeveloped Asia that is being destroyed by imperialist (American) scum with their ruthless missiles. Add to that a roaring Zimmer and maybe Radiohead. Unfortunately, though, with a stupid, unlikeable hero who doesn't know what he wants and betrays everyone who comes in contact with him. John David Washington is cruelly out of place here, and even the little girl is better than him, but that's the least of the problems. The narrative structure is fine, though I was expecting a more interesting twist, but the bigger problem is when some things contradict each other, failing to follow the given rules of the imagined world, which itself works rather oddly. They must have left a lot out in, and it often feels like stroking against the grain. There’s a good film buried in there somewhere, but Gareth Edwards has badly mishandled it and I can't work out if it was already on paper or later in the editing room.
()
A mix of Oblivion, Blade Runner, Elysium and Independence Day, with a meditative Asian setting and a completely uninteresting script and characters. It's a huge shame. The Creator demands big emotions from the viewer, but is unable to offer adequate material to make them happen. That said, the technical aspects are top-notch and the plot premise itself – the clash between A.I. and humans – is very timely and interesting. Untapped potential and Clair de Lune certainly doesn't save it.
()
Why was such a mundane story set in such an amazing world, why did I not care about the characters, and why was the ending so drawn out as to be almost annoying? Gareth Edwards couldn't build (and tear down) on the foundations of Godzilla or Star Wars Rogue One, and this time he came up with something of his own. Unfortunately, he didn't quite succeed. The story is about as dull as the Hans Zimmer music that accompanies it, and if it weren't for the technical flourishes that rival Avatar and that kept me entertained pretty much nonstop, The Creator would have been a mediocre attempt at sci-fi with an idea. I got the urge to watch Blomkamp's Elysium, which is similar in some ways, but it didn't play at anything.
()
The first blockbuster with a script entirely written by AI, The Creator certainly stands out with its impressive visuals, captivating locations, and occasionally excellent cinematography. However, story-wise, it's a mix of various sci-fi tropes and elements (think District 9, Chappie, Short Circuit, Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Avatar: The Way of Water, etc.), making it feel like there's not a single original idea in sight. The first half-hour is fantastic, but it quickly devolves into an endless cat-and-mouse chase filled with clichés and stagnant plot points, ultimately leading to a predictable conclusion. The film tries to be emotional, but it didn't move me at all. Lately, I get easily hooked by father/child relationship dramas, but this one missed the mark. Despite its flaws, I still consider it an above-average entry in the otherwise weak sci-fi landscape of recent years. I highly recommend watching it on the big screen – IMAX especially enhances its visual appeal, ensuring a satisfying viewing experience, even if the memory of it fades a bit more each day after watching.
()
The Creator is one of those films in which the formal side wins out over the content. Visually, it offers appealing locations and, above all, the visuals of the "simulacra", but in terms of story it is a compilation of earlier sci-fi pieces without any major attempt to provide a new insight on the subject of AI. In this "compilation" respect, I thought mostly of James Cameron's work while watching it (Terminator, Avatar or Alita: Battle Angel). Alongside the themes of AI and humans vs. machines, the father-child (Joshua-Alphie) plane had some potential, but was drowned in mediocre concept and a weepy denouement. Of the cast, the young Madeleine Yuna Voyles appealed to me the most, the rest was rather bland. Still, The Creator is certainly worth seeing in the cinema, even if it doesn't offer much material for deeper reflection after the screening.
()
It's been a long time since I've seen a sci-fi film that is so appreciative of the audience and engaging. I could forgive a few mistakes, but here I am finally cheering and enthusiastically declaring that The Creator has succeeded! Often underdeveloped in detail and certainly not 100% in places, but as a whole I simply enjoyed it. I enjoyed the immersive and very nice visuals, I enjoyed the perfect locations, the colourful setting and the whole world created, and I enjoyed the story with its entire plot. There is plenty of action and even if the lack of downright highlight battles is a minor downside, the gunfights are dosed in a big way and therefore I didn't get bored. Then the emotions kicked in at the end and we got a sort of emotional showdown between the characters. The result? Certainly not the fluffy blockbuster we were hoping for and would like to replay night after night, but on the other hand, certainly a completely seamless sci-fi ride that, despite its minor details, a few rushed scenes and at times rather repetitive recycling of escape-fight-escape-fight scenes, has a lot to offer and which I guess deserves a cinema visit. Fans of Star Wars and the director can throw in a star, while viewers expecting something more will take one off. A simple equation.
()
Annonces