Réalisation:
Alexander PayneScénario:
David HemingsonPhotographie:
Eigil BryldMusique:
Mark OrtonActeurs·trices:
Paul Giamatti, Dominic Sessa, Da'Vine Joy Randolph, Carrie Preston, Naheem Garcia, Brady Hepner, Ian Dolley, Jim Kaplan, Michael Provost (plus)VOD (3)
Résumés(1)
Hiver 1970 : M. Hunham est professeur d’histoire ancienne dans un prestigieux lycée d’enseignement privé pour garçons de la Nouvelle-Angleterre. Pédant et bourru, il n’est apprécié ni de ses élèves ni de ses collègues. Alors que Noël approche, M. Hunham est prié de rester sur le campus pour surveiller la poignée de pensionnaires consignés sur place. Il n’en restera bientôt qu’un : Angus, un élève de 1ere aussi doué qu’insubordonné. Trop récemment endeuillée par la mort de son fils au Vietnam, Mary, la cuisinière de l’établissement, préfère rester à l’écart des fêtes. Elle vient compléter ce trio improbable. (Universal International FR)
(plus)Vidéo (7)
Critiques (8)
And the prize for the year's best acting trio goes to ... the chef, Paul Giamatti and his student. Alexander Payne is unique. He always picks a serious subject and wraps it in subtle and sometimes biting humor, and throws in an interesting point on top. The main thing here is how it is possible to humanise a grumpy and strict professor into an understanding and sensitive being without smacking of some cheap scriptwriting crutch. Giamatti absolutely shines in his role, reminiscent of Payne's best film to date, Sideways. There, Giamatti lived only for wine and everything related to it and women were rather on the fringes of his interests, here he lives only for his ancient Greece, for ancient history and women are again on the sidelines for him. Thanks his skill as an actor and his physiognomy, no one would be more suited to the role than the slightly chubby Paul – an Oscar nomination probably won't jingle from this, but it certainly should. And it's not just Paul, but the captain is back in full force after the botched Downsizing, proving why he's a star of independent filmmaking. Payne gently slides between the slightly depressing moods and the feel-good ones, and even though it ends the way it does, you get an awfully good feeling from it all.
()
Alexander Payne knows how to make dramas that are humanly warm one moment and uncomfortably acerbic a few moments later. Few filmmakers are as good at it as him, and I'm glad he reminded us of that with The Holdovers. Paul Giamatti is excellent, as are his two less famous colleagues, both of whom we hope to hear from in the future. There's some excellent work with the gradual reveal of the characters and the fact that everyone carries their past, trauma and insecurities within them and it takes a lot of work to start talking about them or even confronting them. I definitely appreciate that Payne doesn't push the envelope in this regard and is rather restrained in working with emotions, not trying to make the characters laugh, move or bare their innermost selves at all costs. He just follows the three lost souls left to fend for themselves at Christmas. The seventies feel (not just the setting) is beautiful too, and overall it's very nice to watch. Whether you take it as a bittersweet pice or a gritty drama about how everyone just has to deal with certain things on their own, it's still not a bad thing to have someone by your side.
()
I was curious about this praised drama, what makes it so special that everybody admires it and it's not bad. I won’t get any hate from me, but at the same time I don't find much reason to be happy. It's just too ordinary for my taste, the premise was definitely not thought up by 10 heads over half a year, and for a film that can only rely on the story and the actors, I was expecting something more interesting. At least in terms of humour and emotions it's quite bland. When I compare it to films like Whiplash or Green Book, it's a different cup of tea. Paul Giamatti rather annoyed me with his squinting eye, but Dominic Sessa was fine. I would have enjoyed it more if it was set in a school with students. It was okay for one viewing, but I definitely won't go back to it again. 6/10.
()
Feel good, yet feel sad. Alexander Payne delivers one of the best films of the year, and he only needed relatively little to do so: a sensitively written script and some good actors. Ordinary, yet beautiful. I like big, unique and original concepts in movies, but sometimes "a little" is more than "a lot". This conniving little man ambushed me and managed to win me over.
()
From the larger part, it is a classic and friendly human spectacle about individuals who were lost for so long until they found themselves. I perceive a difference compared to other genre colleagues in a greater emphasis on the sad undertone, which makes me smile less and be touched more and think more about how optimistically their lives can continue when there is so much longing and melancholy in them at the same time. Hemingson's script, however, deserved a little trimming, even half an hour. There were a bit too many disagreements and subsequent "agreements" between the professor and the student, each ending as expected. The pastel-smooth visual side and the great central trio convincingly cover up more than one imperfection.
()
Annonces