Réalisation:
Richard KellyScénario:
Richard KellyPhotographie:
Steven PosterActeurs·trices:
Cameron Diaz, James Marsden, Frank Langella, James Rebhorn, Gillian Jacobs, Celia Weston, Lisa K. Wyatt, Holmes Osborne, Andrew Levitas (plus)VOD (1)
Résumés(1)
Les Etats-Unis dans les années 70, Norma, son époux Arthur mènent une vie très ordinaire dans une petite ville américaine jusqu'au jour, où une mystérieuse boîte en verre est déposée devant leur domicile. Peu de temps après, le couple fait la connaissance de l'énigmatique Arlington Stewart. Ce dernier leur explique le fonctionnement de l'appareil muni d'une clef, d'un bouton rouge. En appuyant sur celuici, le couple se verra offrir la coquette somme d'un million de dollars.Malheureusement, ce gain est assorti d'une terrible condition : leur geste entraînerait en effet automatiquementla mort d'un inconnu. Pour le couple, c'est le début d'un terrible dilemme. (Wild Side Video)
(plus)Critiques (8)
Ugh, we've ended up someplace completely different... I expected a lot from this movie. Unfortunately my expectations were not met. The movie was so bland and flavorless and there was too much unnecessary sci-fi. I do appreciate how it could be confusing, since I had to check about three times to make sure the film was from 2009. The clothes, home furnishings, and overall atmosphere are more in keeping with the time 20 years ago. A bit unhinged, but again, boringly unhinged.
()
Un sujet intéressant, une ambiance enivrante unique (musique, décor et en général toute l'ambiance rétro des costumes jusqu'au papier peint des murs). Dommage que l'intrigue de science-fiction en arrière-plan soit si « pré-fantasmagorique » au point de dévaloriser l'ensemble. Mais en tant que véritable aventure créative, le film vaut le détour et suscite certainement des débats plus longs que la plupart des thrillers de science-fiction insipides et stéréotypés.
()
L’une des grosses déceptions de l’année. Ça faisait longtemps que je n’avais pas vu Cameron Diaz dans quoi que ce soit et James Marsden ne m’avait encore jamais déçu. À voir les bandes-annonces, je m’imaginais un policier mystérieux avec des éléments énigmatiques et m'en réjouissais d'avance. Eh bien, finalement, c’était un beau gâchis ! Une connerie qui se retrouve en fait plutôt au rayon science-fiction et qui bascule entre ennui et maladresse. Et ces deux étoiles, elles vont à Frank Langella parce que, quand c’est lui qui apparaissait à l’écran, je trouvais The Box au moins un chouïa divertissant.
()
It’s been very long since a film made me feel so nervous and uncomfortable. The Box has a great atmosphere, a surprisingly brilliant digital retro look and a disturbing story. The direction is quite insane, but with a style that you can tell is intentional. And Frank Langella in the role of a “weird fellow” is almost the incarnation of my nightmares.
()
Kelly has stopped reveling in his own dubious genius and has come back down to earth to serve up a highly polished and inventive genre hybrid with a faded 1970s atmosphere, moral dilemmas, and a demonic Frank Langella. He doesn't bother with long explanations, he simply reminds us of Kubrick and aims straight for the goal. The ending was excellent.
()
I can say for myself that I really enjoyed The Box, and if the director and screenwriter in-one had waited a little longer with the point and the tension had increased, my satisfaction would have been maximum. I realize that even many famous films often don't work at their core. Here, the mysterious atmosphere and omnipresent tension work very well. Actually, the only significant criticism I would have is towards Cameron Diaz's casting. Sweet Cameron, may she not be mad at me, has always been and remains just a typecast actress with limited range. In a film like The Box, the viewer's impression primarily depends on the performances, and it requires someone from among the best character actresses. I don't know, maybe Cameron Diaz was involved in the film as a co-producer, or the production demanded a famous face, but in any case, it was a mistake. Overall impression: 75%.
()
If I had put The Box on, watched the first half and fallen asleep, I wouldn't have regretted it. That entire part of the film is great. The plot with the box, the NASA mysteries thrown in, Cameron Diaz, who was once again surprisingly likable, and especially Frank Langella, who makes every second a pleasure. Not to mention the great music! Unfortunately, in the middle of the second half came strong disappointment. The director/screenwriter probably succumbed to the impression that he had to make a simple story as complex as possible, and so he decided to end The Box in an ugly, pretentious (which in this case means "stupid") and ridiculous way. That’s too bad. The Box should have been either a much shorter film, which then would not have been able to cram all the uselessness into it, or it should have been longer, so that the uselessness could be justified and explained. That’s really too bad. But there is one big plus that I can't deny the second overstuffed half - Langella's monologue about boxes.
()
I think Kelly's gonna give me an ulcer. The man is unbelievable. His films have wonderful elements in them. In the case of The Box, it's the box itself and its concept, the elements of sci-fi, and the excellent retro style. However, as you try to piece it together and follow the film, similar feelings arise as with Apocalypse or Donnie Darko. There are too many themes here. Kelly tries to present his ideas as pivotal, but at the same time, he can't avoid B-movie qualities and he lacks perspective. Kelly just doesn't work for me, and The Box is just further proof of that. There are some great ideas, but they lack consistency. The point is good, but unfortunately you also realize how banal it all is.
()
Annonces