Réalisation:
Paul HaggisPhotographie:
J. Michael MuroMusique:
Mark IshamActeurs·trices:
Sandra Bullock, Don Cheadle, Matt Dillon, Jennifer Esposito, William Fichtner, Brendan Fraser, Terrence Howard, Ludacris, Thandiwe Newton (plus)Résumés(1)
Deux voleurs de voitures. Un serrurier mexicain. Deux inspecteurs de police qui sont aussi amants. Une femme au foyer et son mari, district attorney. Tous vivent à Los Angeles. Eux et beaucoup d'autres ne se connaissent pas, leurs vies n'auraient jamais dû se croiser. Pourtant, dans les prochaines 36 heures, leurs destins vont se rencontrer, révélant ce que chacun voulait cacher ou ne pas voir... (Metropolitan FilmExport)
(plus)Vidéo (2)
Critiques (12)
Peut-être la déclaration de film la plus sincère (et la plus auto-critique) sur les problèmes de son propre pays. Probablement parce que Paul Haggis est un Canadien sensible et qu'il est capable de réfléchir sur l'environnement dans lequel il vit en tant qu'expatrié, mieux que ceux qui y sont nés. Le film, qui relie dramatiquement les parcours de vie de plusieurs protagonistes, a une optique plus globale que par exemple "21 grammes", il suit de plus loin plus de destins et ne les unit pas avec un motif aussi fort, mais il s'agit quand même d'un voyage émotionnel puissant avec de nombreux moments forts qui restent gravés dans la mémoire. Il ne juge personne, les personnages ne sont pas divisés en bons et mauvais, mais ils sont représentés comme des êtres sensibles, contrôlés par de mauvaises forces. "Penses-tu savoir qui tu es ?"
()
There are two free seats on the bus, one of them is next to a white guy, the other is next to someone with brown skin. Where would you sit? This film answers this and similar questions, hinting at the circumstances that lead to them. Is it racism or avoiding a risk from fears based on previous negative experiences? An often unnecessary but quite logical price of mixing nations together.
()
There are certainly a few scenes that get under your skin and make you shudder, but as a whole it’s too contrived, too "for effect" (in this respect I experienced the same feelings at the turning point in Haggis's other film Million Dollar Baby), too many coincidences that I found hard to accept, unbelievable behaviour of some of the characters. I didn’t buy it...
()
The mirror reflecting contemporary America is perhaps angled in a way so as to provide the most effective reflection, but the whole thing is so believable that it's hard to resent it for that. Haggis's minimalist form achieves the best effect, which is an emotional attack on the viewer. Simple camera work, no directorial gimmicks or excesses, subtle music by Mark Isham, and above all, strong content that, in its own way, lacks a unified plot but instead fragments into a complex mosaic of individual human destinies and leaves an incredibly powerful, realistic, and human impact. Moreover, the strong cast elevates the quality of the film even higher. Still, I can't help but bring up one name - Don Cheadle. He is perhaps unfairly overlooked as an actor, but he proved here that he belongs to the absolute top in his field and that he has no issues taking on any role. Coincidences may not exist, but after watching Crash, one can successfully question that notion.
()
Racism and xenophobia in all possible forms in cosmopolitan Los Angeles in the period leading up to Christmas. The storytelling style is similar to Magnolia, especially as far as how the separate stories end up interweaving with each other. Primarily toward the end we get a couple of really powerful moments, effectively supported by excellent music... Despite everything, I couldn’t get over the feeling that it was all too superficial and intended only for effect, which is a shame.
()
Annonces