Réalisation:
Hideo NakataPhotographie:
Gabriel BeristainActeurs·trices:
Naomi Watts, Simon Baker, David Dorfman, Emily VanCamp, Sissy Spacek, Ryan Merriman, Shannon Cochran, Gary Cole, Kelly Overton, James Lesure (plus)VOD (3)
Résumés(1)
Rachel Keller (Naomi Watts) and her son Aiden (David Dorfman) move from Seattle after their first terrible run-in with the tortured evil spirit Samara, relocating to Oregon. Attempting to make a fresh start, Rachel takes a job as a crime reporter at the local newspaper, instantly establishing a pluckily competitive friendship with colleague Max Rourke (Simon Baker). But when it turns out Samara (Kelly Stables) has followed their trail, taking out innocent teens along the way with her old videotape tricks, Rachel dives right back into the mystery. But Samara gets to her son Aiden first. And as a budding photographer in his own right, with a nifty digital camera that he takes everywhere, Aiden quickly finds his own way to harness the relentless ghost. (texte officiel du distributeur)
(plus)Vidéo (2)
Critiques (7)
J'étais prêt à être déçu, mais je ne m'attendais pas à ce que je n'aie même pas envie de le critiquer. Au début, il y avait encore quelques possibilités de développement prometteur de l'histoire, mais en servant ensuite des scènes clichées et absurdes pour le scénario, la confiance du spectateur s'effrite et à la fin, il s'en moque déjà de tout. La courbe est totalement opposée à celle du premier film. Le scénario est juste une bouillie préparée pour essayer par tous les moyens de trouver quelque chose à partir de l'histoire précédente à quoi s'accrocher. Le personnage de Samara n'a plus aucun poids, la peur ne fonctionne qu'à 30% (alors qu'elle fonctionnait à 90% dans le premier film) et échoue souvent au détriment de la dépendance du réalisateur à l'efficacité des effets numériques qu'il ne pouvait pas se permettre jusqu'alors et qui sont malheureusement totalement gratuits. Les seuls points positifs : la sensation de « surnaturel » initiale culminant dans une superbe scène avec les cerfs, une caméra discrète, le superbe thème principal de Hans Zimmer et toujours la belle Naomi Watts.
()
Technically brilliantly filmed, unatmospheric boredom. The main problem is that it completely lacks the atmosphere of part one. This is mainly due to the incredibly dumb screenplay that is all sixes and sevens, absolutely ignoring the rules laid down last time round. Here “fear" is invoked by randomly located, cheap, non-functional frights. The actors have nothing at all to act, so they are stylized into one common expression, and that unfortunately includes Naomi. It is painfully obvious in her performance that if she weren’t bound by contract, she wouldn’t have played in it, given the choice. Only two scenes of the entire two hours of running time are worthy of mention. One for its incredible dumbness (the scene at the university) and one coolly made scene with the bath and the water on the ceiling. I think that Nakata wanted to put an end to remakes of Asian pictures and so he sacrificed himself, putting his reputation on the line and filmed this pile of codswallop to end up on the shelves at the very back of the video rental stores: I see no other logical explanation...
()
Solidly shot wholes/half-parts clash with utterly incompetently shot details in this aesthetically very uneven work. But the camera impotence and the inability to captivate are nothing compared to the stupidity of the script, which has more logical errors than holes in Swiss cheese. And even the idea itself – if it can be called that at all – is rather laughable.
()
Overcast, with occasional Samara... Unpleasant Oregon weather, a few scenes where carpets and floors had to be dried out, one missed "Beware of Digital Wildlife" sign, a small role for Sissy Spacek, still haunted by water since The River with Gibson, and a predictable finale in a well with climbing holds. It's worth noting that the screenwriter tossed the director of the Japanese original into the well, but he didn't climb out... Samara and her phenomenon are already decaying; in The Ring 3, the small, pale Igor Chmela would be the only scary thing left.
()
The same cassette, the same Rachel and Aidan, the same gloomy "neither night nor day" atmosphere, the same musical background. And Hideo Nakata didn't pull it off as well. The plot itself is already absurd, and from the trailer, it is more or less clear that the film had to fall apart at some point, which eventually happens with the unnecessary detour to Samara's mother. However, it is precisely the connection to the visual style of the first film that gives it the feeling of a cohesive story. Besides, when I remember the deer or the fateful well, it immediately gives me goosebumps and convinces me that The Ring Too is definitely not the disaster I predicted it to be. However, I wouldn't venture into further experiments because it could split a treacherous crack in the aura of the first film.
()
Photos (37)
Photo © DreamWorks Home Ent.
![The Ring Two - Couvertures](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/167/651/167651266_jlh8bs.jpg)
Annonces