Réalisation:
John CurranScénario:
Ron NyswanerPhotographie:
Stuart DryburghMusique:
Alexandre DesplatActeurs·trices:
Naomi Watts, Edward Norton, Liev Schreiber, Diana Rigg, Toby Jones, Anthony Wong, Yu Xia, Lu Yin, Zoe Telford, Maggie Steed, Marie-Laure Descoureaux (plus)VOD (1)
Résumés(1)
En 1920, après un mariage pour convenances sociales, Kitty part avec son mari, Walter, médecin bactériologiste, pour vivre à Shanghai où il doit mener des recherches. Rapidement, la jeune femme tombe amoureuse d'un autre homme, marié lui aussi. Lorsque Walter découvre l'adultère dont il est victime, il promet à Kitty de la laisser partir et de lui accorder un divorce qui ne mentionnera pas son infidélité et lui conservera ainsi une réputation sans tâche, si son amant quitte sa femme pour l'épouser. Walter sait que cet homme place sa carrière avant ses nombreuses conquêtes féminines... Abandonnée par son amant, Kitty est contrainte d'accompagner son mari dans une région où une épidémie de choléra balaie les populations et où les guerres locales font rage. Autour d'elle, les gens souffrent, et la manière dont Walter se bat sans compter pour les sauver va pousser Kitty à revoir ses valeurs et à découvrir vraiment l'homme qu'elle a épousé... (Metropolitan FilmExport)
(plus)Critiques (8)
I liked this. A nice, human story about making mistakes and facing consequences for them. Sometimes it's truly an intentional punishment, but then some paths compel us to resolve issues with our significant other, and everything is good again, until... Why not? The beautiful setting of the Asian continent, at least this Chinese part, adds a wonderful charm to the whole story. Sometimes, a person needs a good romance that doesn't push too hard. I'm starting to like Norton more and more due to his versatility.
()
Le réalisateur ne nous permet pas de toucher les personnages et de succomber aux émotions de l'histoire dans la première moitié du film, il est tout aussi immature que son héroïne féminine. Cependant, ce handicap se relâche avec le temps et avec l'évolution du personnage de Naomi Watts, une belle et touchante histoire d'amour entre deux personnes différentes qui se rapprochent à la fin du monde commence à fleurir sur l'écran. Dommage aussi pour la conclusion succincte qui méritait une réflexion plus approfondie. En principe, il s'agit d'une belle carte postale cinématographique des coins exotiques, bien qu'elle soit rapidement oubliable et qu'elle n'atteigne pas l'épopée de l'élite hollywoodienne, mais qui est authentique et chaleureuse à l'intérieur. De la même manière que les récentes réalisations locales du réalisateur australien Phillip Noyce (Rabbit-Proof Fence). Naomi fait du bon travail, mais la tête et le moteur du film sont (encore une fois) Edward Norton, bien qu'il soit beaucoup moins présent à l'écran qu'elle. P.S. Une autre belle bande originale du nouveau venu hollywoodien, Alexandra Desplat.
()
La qualité du Voile des illusions réside dans la distribution pertinente de ses rôles. J’ai l’impression que si Edward Norton et Liev Schreiber inversaient leurs personnages, le résultat serait drôle et pas crédible pour un sou. Ainsi, ce sera l’ennuyeux bactériologue dévoré par ses recherches sous les traits d’Ed et le séduisant diplomate sous ceux de Liev. Et, au milieu, la belle, fragile, naïve et absolument non malicieuse Naomi Watts. Je suis d’avis qu’il s’agit plutôt d’un récit en huis clos et d’un drame sur un couple, par ailleurs magnifiquement joué et magnifiquement tourné. Je ne comparerais pas Le Voile des illusions avec We Don't Live Here Anymore, mais je dois dire que le drame du quatuor amoureux m’a plus marqué.
()
The Painted Veil immediately has several unarguable pluses. Primarily the chemistry between Edward Norton and Naomi Watts. Even the atmosphere of the setting, the camerawork and the music are exceptionally well-done. It has just two downsides that go hand in hand and drag the entire picture into average land. It’s sentimental and predictable. It is really annoying when the storytelling drags on too long, plus you know exactly what, when and how things are going to happen, before it happens. Add to that the knowledge that you have to survive another hour and a half until the end. It is even more disappointing due to the fact that the acting is very high standard and there are a few scenes that work excellently. A shame that there are so few of them.
()
Do we love a person for their virtues or their vices? Sometimes we only realize it on the way back to where we always should have been. I want to take that journey along with the main characters. With a pounding heart and rapid breath. I was prevented by a slightly tired script and John Curran's lack of bravery from the director's chair. Beautiful images with perfect actors only bring temporary joy, without no lasting impact.
()
In many comments, I read how predictable this film is... Well, isn't Titanic predictable? Or the story of Romeo and Juliet? Everyone knows them by heart. However, for some reason, the play "Romeo and Juliet" is considered an exceptionally powerful love story, even though it has nothing to do with love in reality. Infatuation and love are completely different concepts. Love is longing, compassion, and a whole range of other feelings that infatuation lacks. The Painted Veil is a beautiful story about how real love emerges. Tragic, unfulfilled, and highly romantic, brilliantly cast and acted. It is the typical case of perfectly working chemistry between the actors in the lead roles. I have no objections to the supporting characters and their performers either. A very likable experience. Overall impression: 90%.
()
There is no point in going into this remake unless you are familiar with the original. Yes, this is a great melodrama from the 1920s that beautifully combines acting opportunities (which Watts and Norton take advantage of to no end) with a charming landscape. There’s a great sense of period realism, costumes, and sets. There is also no shortage of real-life drama set against the backdrop of the main dramatic arc within the internal strife of a young marriage. But why is it so great today and why does such a film have red colors? It's simple - this is the return of a quality genre that had disappeared and it is welcome. In the days of Garbo's reign on the silver screen, melodramas were plentiful to choose from, but today they are a scarce commodity and that’s truly unfortunate.
()
And alternative, and a prequel to The English Patient, Indochina, and other thematically similar East Asian big films with a focus on romantic and relationship stories. The director's effort and careful work with the characters, whose motivations and conflicts we understand just as well as their reconciliations, cannot be denied. However, when it finally gets going (and you can very well guess how it will end), the ending is much more abrupt than the you would want. The performances are undeniably strong, especially Naomi Watts, who showcases her traditionally refined and proven range of emotions. However, unlike other similarly crafted films, I have no desire to see this one again. It felt unnecessarily bland and tedious in the middle, with nothing to hold onto, and visually not always captivating enough to cover up what was needed.
()
Annonces