Réalisation:
David SladePhotographie:
Jo WillemsMusique:
Brian ReitzellActeurs·trices:
Josh Hartnett, Melissa George, Danny Huston, Ben Foster, Mark Boone Junior, Mark Rendall, Amber Sainsbury, Manu Bennett, Joel Tobeck (plus)VOD (1)
Résumés(1)
Alaska, de nos jours. Au coeur de l'hiver, les habitants de la paisible ville de Barrow s'apprêtent à passer, comme tous les ans, un mois sans soleil. À la suite d'une série d'évènements étranges, Eben et Stella, les deux shérifs locaux, vont découvrir l'invraisemblable vérité. Un gang de vampires a investi la ville pour l'éradiquer de tous ses habitants. Eben, Stella et un petit groupe de survivants vont alors tenter de survivre jusqu'à l'aube... (SND)
(plus)Vidéo (3)
Critiques (11)
Cher gentleman britannique du théâtre Danny Huston dans le rôle du leader des vampires dans un film d'horreur normalement écrit ? Sam Raimi est un producteur fort et innovant. Dès les premiers plans, il est clair que ce n'est pas un film de série B. David Slade peut donner la main à Zack Snyder. Il maîtrise les frissons et prouve qu'il est encore possible de réaliser un film de genre impressionnant sur les vampires. C'est dommage que le film nous serve parfois des scènes de genre éprouvées, qui nous ont récemment - après une très longue période - plu grâce à L'Aube des morts-vivants de Snyder (une petite fille transformée ou une scène identique avec la destruction nécessaire d'un camarade nouvellement infecté). Et c'est aussi dommage que les vampires du "groupe" principal n'aient pas été individuellement plus développés - comme le ferait Guillermo del Toro avec eux. Sinon, c'est génial.
()
David Slade high-fives Sam Raimi, takes a compelling comic book premise, makes us forget about his tragic first film, and serves up arguably the most impressive "A" horror hit of the season. After the ridiculous attempts over the last few years, when vampires were put into latex, etc., predators finally appear on the screen, finally giving us sheer terror. The work with the initial tension and the subsequent massacre is a perfect example of how to effectively build up not only the scene but the film as a whole. The two-hour runtime perhaps deserved more careful script treatment (the occasional lapse in logic or plot deafness), but the unpleasant chills make up for it. Josh Hartnett has finally become a man, the citizens of the backwoods throw out a sharp catchphrase here and there, and the ride with the milling machine is now part of the golden fund. And although horror history won't be radically rewritten via this film, a good few lines of it are sure to be memorable. If only for the fact that most of the people sitting in the movie theater only started eating their popcorn as they were leaving.
()
I liked Hard Candy, but 30 Days of Night almost took my breath away. Why almost? Because the ending was not very believable and the last scene doesn’t fit the film at all. But I have no complaints about the first half: perfect atmosphere, terrifying vampires, effective jump-scares, sharp axe… One of the best horror films of the year and a well deserved 85%.
()
The winter and snow favor the chilling atmosphere, and the cut-off city at the literal end of the world offers some surprises, but when it comes to the creatures of the night, the percentage of interest begins to dangerously decrease. Vampires are not vampires, but a pack of hungry zombies, clichés with suddenly agitated survivors get on your nerves, and even uncompromising bloodthirstiness eventually becomes almost annoying. The weak third star is saved for the town of Barrow by the likable central duo and a surprisingly stylish ending.
()
It was the tenth of January, just about the time most folks are learning to live comfortably with all the New Year's resolutions they broke, and there was one hell of a northeaster blowing outside. Six inches had come down before dark and it had been going hard and heavy since then... Thus begins King's phenomenal vampire story One for the Road. And why am I quoting it? Because it fully captures the atmosphere that abounds in Thirty Days of Night. In the first few shots. Slade made it quite raw and atmospheric. Moreover, the Saw-like cheapness in terms of the violence depicted is simple and all the more impressive because of it. It looks good and the whole introduction until the city is taken over (the bird's eye view scenes - you will understand when you see it) is absolutely perfect. But after that, the creators are no longer able to resist the shortcomings that stem from the mediocre comic book source, which managed to attract attention perhaps only because of its unconventional imagery. These are mainly plot faux-pas: excessive abbreviation, inconsistency of fragmented narration, and utter ignorance of the psychological impact of the situation on individual characters. The closer the movie draws to the end, the lower down the ladder the quality becomes. The only thing keeping it within the bounds of a decent film, are Josh Harnett and Slade's efforts to embellish it with some juicy scenes here and there. Overall, it is undoubtedly a solid achievement, which benefits quite a bit from the fact that we haven’t seen anything this in a long time. As much as Thirty looks alright, and is enjoyable in its own way, it cannot escape the stigma of simplicity and the dull mediocrity of the comic book despite all its efforts...
()
Photos (51)
Photo © Columbia Pictures
![30 jours de nuit - Film](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/166/114/166114617_46130e.jpg)
Annonces