Réalisation:
Clark GreggScénario:
Clark GreggPhotographie:
Tim OrrMusique:
Nathan LarsonActeurs·trices:
Sam Rockwell, Anjelica Huston, Kelly Macdonald, Brad William Henke, Heather Burns, Paz de la Huerta, Gillian Jacobs, Bijou Phillips, Clark Gregg (plus)Résumés(1)
Cherchant de quoi payer la clinique privée où sa mère est hospitalisée en psychiatrie, Victor monte une redoutable escroquerie. Alors qu'il dîne dans les meilleurs restaurants, il fait semblant de s'étouffer et s'arrange pour que de bons Samaritains viennent à son secours: ces derniers se prennent alors d'affection pour lui et finissent par le couvrir de chèques. Son boulot est tout aussi surprenant puisqu'il endosse le costume d'un domestique irlandais du XVIIIème siècle dans un parc d'attractions historiques. Et lorsqu'il n'est pas en train de jouer les pèlerins, de s'étouffer en mangeant - ou encore de rendre visite à sa mère qui ne le reconnaît plus -, il participe à des thérapies de groupe pour obsédés sexuels. Pas étonnant que Victor se sente largué. Mais quand sa mère, dont l'état de santé se détériore, laisse entendre qu'elle est prête à lui révéler l'identité du père qu'il n'a jamais connu, Victor espère obtenir enfin les réponses aux questions qu'il se pose depuis si longtemps. (20th Century Fox FR)
(plus)Vidéo (1)
Critiques (4)
It started off like your typical, breezy American comedy, so I was mentally prepared for cringe jokes and a plot I could see coming from a mile away. But the outcome was nothing like what I expected. While it didn't hit the "amazing" mark, this movie landed some laughs because the humor was spot-on. The creators even managed to weave in some drama, turning what I thought was just another simple comedy into something with a deeper level. I'm a fan of Sam Rockwell, and my current rewatch of Community definitely added to the enjoyment, especially with Gillian Jacobs playing a role. And let's not forget the invaluable contribution to skin cancer prevention — thanks to a simple piece of advice, many blondes can significantly boost their defenses against this sneaky disease. In the end, what I anticipated as a laid-back comedy turned out to have depth, proving I jumped the gun in my judgment. I acknowledge my mistake by awarding four stars. / Lesson learned: Don't let your past hold you back.
()
Even if I didn't know the author of the book, I would figure out while watching the film that it had to be written by the same person who wrote "Fight Club." The provocation and the effort to mystify us are very similar. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about the director's position because Gregg is two levels weaker than Nolan, and it is very noticeable in the film. Choke doesn't have nearly the same atmosphere as Fight Club, and you can't admire the director's finesse. It works more based on lines, jokes, provocations, and sexual innuendos in a puritanical American environment. While Fight Club deals with the phenomenon of violence, Choke deals with human sexuality. It's actually similar to Zack and Miri Make a Porno, in a very unconventional setting and with very atypical characters. If you found Fight Club too controversial, then avoid Choke because the added artistic value doesn't work here. I did have a good time with it, even though it wasn't a great intellectual experience. Simply a comedic escapade. Overall impression: 70%.
()
A kinky drama with lots of sexual innuendo with the once again awesome Sam Rockwell, who is addicted to sex. I had a few good laughs and there is an interesting twist, so the film is definitely worth recommending. I'll give it a better three stars, as I found the film slightly out of breath in the second half. 65%
()
Untapped potential is not the right expression, but it’s the first that comes to mind. This adaptation doesn't particularly disgrace the book, but it's just a crude illustration of the source material. And I don't like that, a little inventiveness wouldn't hurt.
()
Annonces