Réalisation:
Roland EmmerichPhotographie:
Karl Walter LindenlaubMusique:
David ArnoldActeurs·trices:
Will Smith, Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman, Mary McDonnell, Judd Hirsch, Mae Whitman, Vivica A. Fox, Margaret Colin, Robert Loggia, James Rebhorn (plus)VOD (5)
Résumés(1)
Une immense soucoupe volante envahit le ciel terrestre, libérant un nombre infini de plus petites soucoupes qui prennent position au-dessus des plus grandes villes du monde. Un informaticien new-yorkais décrypte les signaux émanant des etranges voyageurs. Ils ne sont pas du tout amicaux et ces extraterrestres se preparent a attaquer la Terre. (texte officiel du distributeur)
(plus)Critiques (10)
Honestly speaking, I don't consider myself a fan of the highly peculiar director Roland Emmerich and his pompous megalomaniacal movies. The theme of alien invasion has been seen countless times in B-movie sci-fi films before Emmerich, and Emmerich simply decided that if he couldn't make the first one, he would at least make the biggest alien invasion in the history of cinema. So the sky is filled with thousands of gigantic flying saucers. I mean, why not use the cliché that the movie audience has perfectly absorbed in their blood? These monstrous artificial bodies have dozens, even hundreds of kilometers in diameter, and apparently, neither the screenwriter nor the director are burdened by the problem of maneuvering such oversized vehicles in the gravitational fields of the moons and planets of our solar system, nor the fact that they suddenly appear here. Otherwise, it is exceptionally pathetic, patriotic, and heroic. So, who can get into a fighter jet to bravely face an alien invasion? The American president, of course. Emmerich has not yet made a masterpiece in the genre, and Independence Day is no exception to that rule. Overall impression: 40%.
()
“I steal, you steal, we steal.” Or how Emmerich and Devlin got together, dumped their brain concoctions into a common cauldron, stirred it properly and prepared an inedible slop. I turned off my brain and just wanted to have fun, but even a lobotomy wouldn't have helped. The massive avalanche of clichés and stupidity swept me away in such a way that I wouldn't want to repeat it.
()
"Comrades, ugly enemy agents have landed in our country from outer space in order to plant potato mandelins in our harvesting pools. Comrades, we're not going to subvert the States! Moreover, we have the victorious July, so get them!" Capitalist realism in full force, as demented as Bolshevik agitations, as spectacularly pathetic. Plus, the characters. A good-humored "nigga," a heroic president-pilot, a drunk with the heart of a Don Cossack...an... intrepid cowboy... Just a case of brilliantly making a stinking ball out of a pathetic fart. A film about nothing with nice effects. The glamour and misery of Hollywood in full swing. It wasn't custom made for the White House??? Edit 2011: I have to admit that (like many Bolshevik agitations) I enjoy this film and fills me with a special pleasure of absolute foolishness. So, in hindsight, I'm giving it an extra star, compared to Battle Los Angeles, it's royal fun, and it doesn't deserve the same rating...
()
Switch off your brain, make a big bucket of popcorn for yourself, turn the volume up (there’s no point in watching it anywhere else but at either a home or a regular theater) and make yourself believe the misleading phrase “it’s a spoof" and, mainly, take it easy. If you manage to persuade yourself that it really is meant as a spoof then it is an excellent B-grade catastrophe movie with a huge budget and well known, but mostly terrible actors (with one exception of Will Smith, brimming with snappy lines) and it’s decently paced. On top of all that it’s too long and overflowing with American pathos to an extent that can be trumped only by Emmerich himself in his subsequent movies.
()
Roland Emmerich bursts the floodgates with pathos. Bill Pullman is completely off with his heroic president, Will Smith is embarrassing, Jeff Goldblum might as well not have been there at all – and this is all just a minor, overrated mishap. This variation on War of the Worlds didn't work out and despite the gripping scene of the destruction of the White House, I have an aversion towards this film.
()
A visually stunning masterpiece with fantastic music and a likeable cast. The script is packed with action and there isn't a single dull moment, there’s always something happening, one twist after another, and some scenes are truly fantastic (Area 51, city destruction, the scenes after the apocalypse, etc.). In addition, Roland Emmerich brilliantly combines visuals with music in a way similar to Michael Bay, for example. The pathos must be taken with a grain of salt, and whether we like it or not, we have to admit that Bill Pullman has charisma. It's not smart sci-fi, it's popcorn entertainment, but damn well directed, well acted, and decently told. Overall, Independence Day is unequivocally Emmerich's best film, or rather, his only truly good film.
()
The Hollywood high-budget blockbuster of the 1990s in its full and immaculate glory. I’ve seen it at least thirty times, but the intensity of the experience remains unrelenting and the internal scheme of the narrative as a mediator of a global catastrophe is exemplary. There are dozens of characters, but each of them has an important function in communicating with the viewer, who learns about the alien attack from the point of view of the president, a brilliant scientist, a verbose soldier and the general population, so the presentation of the plot is really incredibly complex and well thought out. It may reek of American pathos and naivety, but Independence Day is simply so well constructed, scored and acted, supported by amazing visual effects and the ultimate adrenaline rush, that I will watch it thirty more times in the future and the general term "Legend" will increasingly come to mind. An incredible romp that will never get old and, above all, will never be surpassed within the genre.
()
Independence Day is in a typically Emmerich vein, with this film being one of the first pieces to feature the director’s penchant for monster-scale visual effects, as well as the catastrophic-apocalyptic feel and the American heroism of the main characters. The cast was mostly likeable, the plot moved along, although twenty minutes less running time would not have hurt, and from a technical point of view it is a very successful achievement. In short, one of those films that is great for switching off the brain and unwinding.
()
I believe that at the time it was released, it was a fine innovative blockbuster that managed to shock. Today, however, Independence Day doesn't impress at all, because we've seen everything in it a thousand times and better. The acting is average, the visuals were fine for the time, but today they are rather laughable, and the completely formulaic plot doesn't add to its appeal either. Roland Emmerich's sci-fi vision, which he spins over and over again in each of his films, also slowly comes across as his pure egotism and personal ambition to make films "for himself", I guess I can't really explain it any other way. I was thinking that this particular piece is quite famous, well-known and praised, but for me it's just a below average misstep that I'd rather not remember tomorrow.
()
It was great science fiction for its time, and perhaps not so surprisingly, it's still great science fiction nearly twenty years later. Emmerich has managed to create a great special effects film that perhaps best portrays the fear of being attacked. Yes, it's very American, but that's obvious from the title, isn't it? Some of the moral talk about unifying the world is a bit grating, but it probably wouldn't be possible without pathos.
()
Annonces