Réalisation:
Tom HooperPhotographie:
Danny CohenActeurs·trices:
Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne, Helena Bonham Carter, Sacha Baron Cohen, Samantha Barks, Aaron Tveit (plus)VOD (3)
Résumés(1)
Dans la France du 19e siècle, Les Misérables raconte une histoire poignante de rêves brisés, d'amour malheureux, de passion, de sacrifice et de rédemption : l'affirmation intemporelle de la force inépuisable de l'âme humaine. Hugh Jackman interprète Jean Valjean, l'ex-bagnard poursuivi sans relâche des décennies durant par l'impitoyable policier Javert (Russell Crowe). Mais quand Jean Valjean promet à Fantine (Anne Hathaway) de sauver sa fille Cosette du destin tragique dont elle est elle-même victime, la vie du forçat et de la gamine va en être changée à tout jamais. (Universal International FR)
(plus)Vidéo (42)
Critiques (8)
Le genre musical est le seul qui me reste en travers de la gorge (à l’exception de Moulin Rouge !), donc mon jugement est très subjectif. Je prends toujours mon mal en patience pendant les passages chantés, ceux-ci étant la pilule à avaler entre les dialogues. Sauf qu’ici, ils forment 99 % des cent soixante minutes du métrage et ne sont pas toujours interprétés par des acteurs qui savent chanter (Crowe). Pour moi, c’était un calvaire auquel j’ai survécu grâce à la grande qualité de la scénographie et de la photographie, lesquelles donnent à l’ensemble plus de relief que dans la plupart des films en 3D.
()
A world where there is no room left to search for mistakes or inaccuracies. Les Misérables by Tom Hooper is filled with emotions, captivating performances, and breathtaking production to the very edge. And when you spend the movie suffering with Fantine, hunting with Javert, or crying with Éponine, there is no defense against the enthusiasm that results. The stunning finale resonates almost unstoppably in every sense.
()
Honestly, it took a lot of effort to make it through the final hour, so tediously drawn out was the last "revolutionary" act. Yet the film didn't start off badly at all. For the first twenty minutes I was getting used to the singing and learning not to expect the spoken word, but I quite liked the next hour or so (especially Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter were great) and Hugh Jackman and Russell Crowe were the perfect choice for acting and singing. But the ending(s)... I don't know the original musical, so I had no idea how long any song would be, and so with Javert's finale came the real hell (in my mind I was thinking: "Now! Come on! Now!" and it didn't, the next verse came) and the very end made the hell even hotter. Two and a half.
()
Suffering. It is solid craftsmanship with excellent production design, where inexperienced viewers will say, “this was a truly valuable and artistic film after a long time”. The qualities are debatable, but not due to my dislike for the genre. Not even Russel Crowe and Hugh Jackman singing can save it, no matter how good they were in their roles. Throughout the film, I had the impression that if there was no singing, it would have been a considerably better experience.
()
After the mixed responses to Hooper’s Les Misérables from both American and Czech critics, I was convinced I would hate it with all my heart and I went to the cinema basically as an obligation. But I did well because Les Misérables enchanted and emotionally disarmed me. At the beginning my resistance was still successful, but it took about three songs for me to dive into the story, and I really enjoyed the rest of the movie. Overall, I think this musical conception was a very interesting experience: there’s filth and realism, on one side, and a display of musical performances and singing on the other… a very interesting experience. For me it’s more interesting and bolder than the over-hyped The King's Speech, I can’t reproach Tom Hooper (and before the première I though Les Misérables was a cowardly safe bet.). 9/10
()
Annonces