Réalisation:
Alexandre AjaScénario:
Keith BuninPhotographie:
Frederick ElmesMusique:
RobActeurs·trices:
Daniel Radcliffe, Juno Temple, James Remar, Kelli Garner, Max Minghella, Joe Anderson, Laine MacNeil, Heather Graham, David Morse, Kathleen Quinlan (plus)VOD (1)
Résumés(1)
Soupçonné d'avoir assassiné sa fiancée, rejeté par tous ceux qu'il connaît, Ignatius (Daniel Radcliffe) a sombré dans le désespoir. Un matin, il se réveille avec des cornes sur la tête. Celles-ci lui donnent un étrange pouvoir, celui de faire avouer leurs plus noirs secrets aux gens qu'il croise. Ignatius se lance alors à la recherche du véritable meurtrier... (Metropolitan FilmExport)
(plus)Vidéo (3)
Critiques (10)
Une belle envolée créative, mêlant avec aisance des genre difficiles à concilier, tout en se moquant aussi de leurs saints clichés (conseil d'un curé, flics gays). Aja n'est pas seulement un excellent réalisateur d'horreur. Aja est un amoureux d'histoires dramatiques avec une dimension romantique et sait jongler magnifiquement avec les genres populaires décadents. Et c'est son nouveau rêve humide, original et difficile à imiter, pour lequel, d'ailleurs, Stephen King est également enthousiaste.
()
Absolute psycho that often goes way over the top, but I enjoyed it more than part 1. The fact that it’s a sequel is capitalized upon and so everything is bigger, more explosive and the humor even crazier. Miller and Lord thrive on knick-knacks, antiracism and also... on male comradery. Awesome final credits.
()
Daniel Radcliffe wants to free himself from his fateful character so much that I feel like since the end of the Harry Potter saga, he deliberately only takes roles of characters that are crazy or not quite alright. Good for him. So far, it has paid off without an issue. Horns is a fantasy crime investigation movie that abstractly tells the story of a murder. I admit that without thehorns, it would be a classic crime investigation, but it’s all the more fun with them because I’ve never seen such an idea before. What’s more, it is filmed in such a clever way that there can be no talk of a B-grade movie. I have to say – it really made me happy.
()
I never saw Horns during its premiere, and I was disappointed about that. The idea of exposing a person to brutal social pressure and mental suffering to such an extent that they are unable to bear it in a rational way and unwillingly transform into a supernatural being from another (dark) world was already masterfully portrayed by Bulgakov in "The Master and Margarita." In my opinion, such a concept has great potential, but the director and screenwriter managed to completely squander it through their hard work. In many comments, Daniel Radcliffe's involvement in the main role is discussed. Although his performance is not Oscar-worthy, it didn't bother me, and his presence eventually became one of the few positives that can be said about Horns. Horns could have been many things, ranging from dark fantasy to a horror comedy (let's remember how excellently The Witches of Eastwick turned out). Instead, Alexandre Aja created a didactic morality tale full of sentiment, permeated with religious symbolism, and using the most clichéd genre tropes. I could partially forgive him for that if he hadn't been so literal and pathetic, and if he had been more sophisticated and imaginative. This is a disappointment. Overall impression: 25%.
()
Very decent. Daniel Radcliffe's career is assured, here he only confirms his acting qualities. It's funny, entertaining, original and very clever. The ending is very spectacular, a perfect shot of a stick and a breathtaking scene with snakes, which is already a cult classic for me. It could have been shorter, but I still had a decent time. 75%
()
Annonces