Réalisation:
Mikkel NørgaardScénario:
Nikolaj ArcelPhotographie:
Eric KressActeurs·trices:
Nikolaj Lie Kaas, Fares Fares, Sonja Richter, Peter Plaugborg, Per Scheel-Krüger, Troels Lyby, Øyvind B. Fabricius Holm, Søren Pilmark, Divya Das (plus)VOD (2)
Résumés(1)
Suite à l'échec d'une opération, l'inspecteur chef Carl Mørck est affecté à la Section Q, dédiée aux vieilles affaires classées. Elle ne compte que deux membres: lui-même et son nouvel assistant, Assad. Bien qu'on leur ait ordonné de se contenter de lire et de trier les dossiers, l'opiniâtreté de Carl les plonge dans les mystères de la disparition de Merete Lynggaard. Cette belle femme politique a disparu cinq ans plus tôt d'un ferry. Le seul témoin est son frère, atteint de lésions cérébrales, qu'on a retrouvé hurlant sur le pont. L'affaire a été momentanément classée, concluant au suicide. Mais peu convaincus par cette explication, Carl et Assad se lancent dans une enquête qui les mènera bien au-delà de l'apparente courtoisie de la société scandinave. (texte officiel du distributeur)
(plus)Critiques (10)
Un scénario pour un polar télévisé décent aux visuels et à la distribution rehaussés pour le grand écran. L'absence de moments de surprise, le côté élémentaire de l’histoire et la présence de clichés du genre en font un film moyen. Millénium était plus sophistiqué, plus complexe.
()
L'adaptation du premier volet de la série de livres nordiques est un départ prometteur. L'intrigue est très bonne, mais elle rencontre néanmoins des personnages trop simplistes et une réalisation moyenne. Un inconvénient est également la grande quantité d'artifices scénaristiques.
()
Je suis un grand fan de la série de livres de Jussi Adler-Olsen. Sur base de mon expérience avec les adaptations d'œuvres littéraires, j'ai ravalé mes attentes. Jusqu’à la moitié du métrage, je me disais que ça manquait d’entrain et de substance, contrairement au livre duquel il est par ailleurs difficile de se détacher. Mais ensuite, je me suis mis à réévaluer mon opinion, parce que le film m’a comblé par ses visuels. Comme avec bon nombre d’adaptations cinématographiques d'écrits célèbres, on pourrait se lancer dans une série de reproches. Mais il me semble que, d'une certaine manière, les points négatifs se sont progressivement transformés en points positifs, ou bien ont partiellement ou totalement disparu. Je me représentais Carl dans la cinquantaine ou plus et Lie Kaas me laissait perplexe au vu de son âge, mais peu à peu, ce fait-là aussi a cessé de me déranger. Fares Fares fait un excellent Assad, un peu comme je l'avais imaginé. Sonja Richter ne m'a encore jamais déçu et s’est révélée être un très bon choix pour Merete. La distribution est d’ailleurs impeccable sur toute la ligne. Le film n'est pas aussi captivant que le livre, mais il fait le poids grâce à ses atouts. Et maintenant, en route pour Les Enquêtes du Département V : Profanation !
()
I feel like once you fall in love with Scandinavian crime investigation movies, that love never fades away. That’s why it makes me so happy that out of the whole range of books I’ll never manage to read, there’s one that the Scandinavians decided to make into a movie. I didn’t yet manage to get through the Department Q series from Olsen, but The Keeper of LostCauses grabbed my attention at first glance. It was worse when I started watching the movie – it took me about half an hour to get used to Carl. His character was very bland and wishy-washy, but Assad made up for it as his character was likeable from the very beginning. But eventually, I got used to both of them as investigators and what really helped was the story itself, which was outright flawless. The ending was a bit unfinished and half-assed, but I have to give it at least four stars just out of the excitement and joy that the Scandinavians decided to shoot such a movie.
()
A very model, stylish, even pre-stylized detective story, which replaces the view, sarcasm and momentum of the original with a number of formal and motive clichés. Mikkel Nørgaard has his finger on the pulse of the time period, because he participated in the serial political drama Borgen. Compared to the horribly cowardly and impotent film The Hypnotist, The Keeper of Lost Causes is much more photogenic, fiercer, and sharper, though sometimes there are attempts to make the viewer feel out of balance unnecessarily beyond self-purpose. I have a more fundamental problem with the character of Carl, who in the film version is a textbook example of a Nordic loner and a guy with depression... but the book prototype is much more humorous and lively, which distinguishes him from the generic stack of frowning guys on vodka with Xanax. Lie Kaas may be able to play his star power at home, but his Carl is simply not an interesting character, and the protagonist's interaction with his film partner Assad is at about a quarter of the throttle compared to the book. I could easily imagine this detective story being a little longer, bolder and more pampered. If the creators focused as much attention on the characters that they do on tearing out teeth, the film could be more than a solid series pilot with a metrosexual visual. [65%]
()
An unfortunately executed adaptation. It is based on an ironic (and funny) anti-bureaucratic toned, House-style novel by Mørck and a psychological depiction of the investigator and the victim. Contrarily, the standard genre plot is more an essential excuse linking everything together than anything else. But here the two most special assets that make this different from the regular productions of this genre are thoroughly overshadowed and the stress is put purely on the crime storyline; and that is as run-of-the-mill as is possible in this genre.
()
A good old-fashioned crime story from the North. I don't seek out the crime genre, but once every six months it doesn't hurt to watch something that entertains, surprises and intrigues from this genre. The highlight of the film for me is the scene with the slow motion shot of the falling car, which was literally breathtaking... Decent direction, actors and plot. For fans of the crime genre I recommend it. 65%.
()
An excellent crime drama that doesn't try to throw in unnecessary twists and turns and instead goes purely for its goal, focusing on a very strong emotional conclusion. Lie Kaas is solid, unemotional, I'm not used to him in such a role. It feels a bit like a pilot to a series, and why not, I'm quite curious about the other Department Q cases.
()
If I had seen the film first and didn't know much about the book, it probably wouldn't grab me as much. I could easily imagine this as a very good introduction to a television series. The plot is simple but well-structured, and the characters are interesting and definitely not boring, but as a beginning for a film series, it didn't strike me as particularly strong. Good, but not exceptional.
()
Another terrific Nordic mystery that feels rather more intimate (e.g. when compared to the Millennium trilogy), but overall an excellent opening to the loose Department Q cold case series. A great main duo that, while fulfilling perhaps every possible genre schema/cliché (the formerly successful, now downgraded investigator with a tendency to alcoholism and the ad hoc assigned partner who comes across as a perfect wimp at first); on the other hand, is one of the supporting elements of the whole narrative and I'm very curious to see the evolution of the two main characters in the next installments.
()
Annonces