Casino Royale

Oh, my... I liked What's New, Pussycat? better, but it's hard to compare it to Casino Royale, because I have the strong impression that Casino Royale isn't really even a film. Well, certainly not one film. It's like five completely different films, which, by a supernatural coincidence, found themselves on the same screen one beautiful evening. Otherwise, I can't explain the existence of this more than two-hour-long romp full of ace actors, extremely beautiful women, humor of all kinds and basically anything you can think of (including Hitler). Woody Allen made me laugh the most (he definitely wrote his own scenes), and if anything bothered me, it was the lack of Monty Python. (07/12/2014)

This is simply madness; while it may be the first adaptation of Casino Royale, above all, it's a farce where everything possible seems to have found its way in. What impresses me the most is the presence of amazing actors, moreover, in an unbelievably large number. It's not even possible to say who excels here, although Ursula Andress is certainly eye-catching, as are Niven, Sellers, or Allen, each in their own unique way. And of course, I mustn't forget Orson Welles, who was supposed to be on a bit of a diet. (29/04/2014)