Réalisation:
Luca GuadagninoScénario:
James IvoryPhotographie:
Sayombhu MukdeepromActeurs·trices:
Timothée Chalamet, Armie Hammer, Michael Stuhlbarg, Amira Casar, Esther Garrel, Victoire Du Bois, Peter Spears, Vanda CaprioloVOD (5)
Résumés(1)
Été 1983. Elio Perlman, 17 ans, passe ses vacances dans la villa du XVIIe siècle que possède sa famille en Italie, à jouer de la musique classique, à lire et à flirter avec son amie Marzia. Son père, éminent professeur spécialiste de la culture gréco-romaine, et sa mère, traductrice, lui ont donné une excellente éducation, et il est proche de ses parents. Sa sophistication et ses talents intellectuels font d’Elio un jeune homme mûr pour son âge, mais il conserve aussi une certaine innocence, en particulier pour ce qui touche à l’amour. Un jour, Oliver, un séduisant Américain qui prépare son doctorat, vient travailler auprès du père d’Elio. Elio et Oliver vont bientôt découvrir l’éveil du désir, au cours d’un été ensoleillé dans la campagne italienne qui changera leur vie à jamais. (Sony Pictures Releasing France)
(plus)Critiques (9)
To be honest, this film is nothing special. A summer Italian drama from the eighties, whose benefit is certainly the music, which makes this movie quite interesting. However, the acting is nothing unique. The premise of The Brokeback Mountain is set in the Italian countryside and highlighted by culture, historic buildings, beaches and first loves. Everything is good, I would just simply leave out the main plot.
()
Citizen Kane pour la communauté gay. Un film qui parle ouvertement mais avec élégance et sensibilité de tout ce que Moonlight n'osait dire, en le masquant d'un éclat artistique scintillant de clair de lune. Un chef-d'œuvre avec de nombreuses scènes inconfortables pour le spectateur hétérosexuel, mais un art narratif de premier ordre pour le cinéphile exigeant et attentif. Une représentation détaillée et absolument précise de l'embrasement d'une passion interdite, une direction d'acteurs aux performances phénoménales, une utilisation originale de la musique, une capture de l'atmosphère et de l'humeur de l'époque et de l'endroit, l'intensification du thème principal par le biais de l'art et de son l'admiration, et surtout le monologue final du père et les génériques finaux font de ce film l'un des plus puissants sur le premier amour et la passion entièrement dévouée entre les êtres humains. Tout le temps, mais surtout depuis le premier dialogue ouvert sur la place, j'avais l'impression de regarder un classique du cinéma des années soixante-dix d'un des maîtres de la cinématographie européenne comme Tornatore ou Fellini. Le cinéma de référence sur les relations amoureuses qui s’enseigne dans les écoles de cinéma et que personne ne cherche même à imiter, encore moins à surpasser.
()
Il faut admettre que ce film est intéressant d’un point de vue artistique et qu’il réussit à transmettre l’ambiance de la campagne lombarde, « là où a crevé le chien » et où l’on n’a rien de mieux à faire, l’été, que de se prélasser au bord de l’eau et de se demander avec qui on irait bien danser ou fricoter. Cela dit, la deuxième partie a manqué de m’enchanter et je trouvais qu’elle tirait en longueur. La nomination de Chalamet pour les Oscars relève probablement de l’erreur, à moins qu’elle ne concerne juste la scène finale qui frappe très fort sur le plan émotionnel. Pour moi, le climax du film est le monologue du père d’Elie – « quand tu t’y attends le moins, la nature trouve sournoisement ton point faible… » Un bon film d’ambiance.
()
The performances of Armie Hammer and Timothée Chalamet have received all the honours, but the hero, and the main reason why Call Me by Your Name is one of the best films of the year, is the director, Luca Guadagnino. It’s amazing how he managed to capture the atmosphere of the place and the time where a story like this can happen. Summer in Lombardy, where everything is soaked in rich history, antiquity and the renaissance, the love for knowledge, the fascination for art, philosophy and beauty as such – of body and mind. That’s why the monologue of the father at the end makes sense and why it could be so non-conflicting.
()
A gentle story of one summer that hides a surprisingly strong added value thanks to its free atmosphere. Though at first it seemed a bit too artsy for a love story, from the moment an elusive feeling starts to emerge between the piano notes, Luca Guadagnino was effortlessly leading me on a hook. And however much some viewers may argue that two hours is too long for a story unfolding this casually, I would gladly welcome another two. I was so tense, afraid this delicate bond would break.
()
If awards were given solely for building an atmosphere that supplements the narration of a story, Guadanino would need to build a two-story shed in his garden to house them. Call Me By Your Name is an incredibly focused film that you have to watch with attention to find meaning in the details and the snippets of a story unbound by logical conflicts and twists. There were moments when it felt tedious and aloof, and the message didn’t hit me right in the heart, but this is a big movie, no doubt, with brilliant performances and a narration with a feeling for credible emotions about the complexity of deep human relationships. Moonlight may have won the Oscar, but compared to this formally precise probe into male intimacy, it feels like a very shallow and empty wannabe arthouse flick (which it basically is). 85%
()
If the whole film had ridden a similar easygoing wave as it did in its last third, it would have been a memorable experience for me. But unfortunately, the impressive conclusion is preceded by a very lengthy "prologue" that really made it hard to watch with its impressionistic, even poetic, nature. I have nothing to fault the cast, Timothée Chalamet and Armie Hammer had the necessary chemistry between them and I trusted them. But I'm a bit stumped as to how the film won the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay – personally, I would have cut it by at least twenty minutes and added to the build-up of the plot. On the one hand, I understand the intention in terms of the gradual narrative and the birth of a fragile relationship between two people, but as a viewer I simply found it taxing in terms of holding my attention. The highlights for me were undoubtedly the scenes of Elio and Oliver's last days together and the final conversation between father and son. With this film, on the one hand, I understand all the fuss and positive reactions, which is why, on the other hand, it makes me all the more sorry that I can't join the enthusiastic fans and admirers of this piece of cinema. (P.S. Maybe I'll come back to the film after reading the book and reconsider everything!)
()
Timothée Chalamet and his portrayal of a teenage boy unsure of his orientation who falls in love with an older intern is fine, but that's about it. The performance is respectable, but the rest isn't worth much. The locations are uninteresting, the plot is practically non-existent and the 130 minutes are just too much. A huge borefest...
()
This is a romantic film about two young men falling in love, one of who is a little younger. At first glance, it’s nothing revolutionary, but at second glance it’s a beautiful film about love, nature, people, and a time period. Everything here is captured so accurately, naturally, and sensitively that the entire time I was watching how simply beautiful a film can be.
()
Annonces