Réalisation:
Ruben ÖstlundScénario:
Ruben ÖstlundPhotographie:
Fredrik WenzelActeurs·trices:
Claes Bang, Elisabeth Moss, Dominic West, Terry Notary, Sofie Hamilton, Christopher Læssø, John Nordling, Linda Anborg, Jan Lindwall, Iman Mirbioki (plus)VOD (3)
Résumés(1)
Meet Christian, the respected curator of a prestigious contemporary art gallery. A divorced but devoted father of two, Christian drives an electric car, says all the right things, supports good causes, and is on the verge of opening his new show “The Square” - an installation which invites passers-by to examine their willingness to help others.But disaster strikes when Christian’s phone is stolen, his new performance art piece turns dangerously awry, and his marketing campaign goes viral for all the wrong reasons. As Christian desperately tries to hold onto his own ego while his comfortable life spirals out of control, his good intentions are increasingly abandoned, with hilarious results. (Sharmill Films)
(plus)Critiques (7)
Un miroir remarquable de la société occidentale contemporaine avec son hypocrisie et en même temps son désir d'une exactitude maximale. Beaucoup de scènes excellentes, originales et percutantes qui coupent le souffle du spectateur, mais aussi beaucoup de scènes qui tirent inutilement le film sur une durée excessive. Peut-être que c'était l'intention d'Östlund (« Cet objet devient-il de l'art lorsque nous le plaçons dans un musée ? »), mais s'il l'était, il n'aurait pas dû ralentir le film, seulement le compléter en suggérant un arrière-plan. Moins aurait été plus. De toute façon, il est l'équivalent d'un frère du Happy End de Haneke, qui aborde un sujet similaire.
()
Je ne suis pas surpris que The Square m’ait été recommandé par quelqu’un du milieu des galeries d’art. C'est un film sur l'art, ses limites, ce qui est correct, ce qui ne l'est plus, où sont les frontières de l'admissibilité et de l'acceptation. La Suède est peut-être en train de succomber au politiquement supercorrect et ne sait pas sur quel pied danser, même si son gouvernement est soutenu par la droite dure. J'apprécie les idées originales (expositions, performances artistiques, singe dans l'appartement…).
()
Ruben Östlund is probably the most interesting director and screenwriter of contemporary Scandinavia. Twice I rated his films with the full five stars, for his impersonal but brilliantly told stories. Here, however, I will be a bit critical – but really just a bit. The Square has a rather complex premise, and you have to think hard to understand what its creator is getting at. It features a number of inventive and original scenes, but its unnecessary long running time is to its disadvantage. The fact that the metaphorical square is supposed to be the contemporary Europe is still boggling my mind. In my opinion a rather interesting insight into the high Scandinavian society of today.
()
A film brimming with meanings and food for thought - from the comic character of a liberal and an egoist, a satirical image of institutionalized art, to a broad metaphor of a society torn between selfishness and altruism. However, Östlund's strength is also his weakness. Unlike the comprehensive concept of Play the and the concentrated relationship study of Force Majeure, in The Square, the Swede wanders, looks for the exact timing of scenes and a disturbing moment when, due to their duration, meaning breaks. It has some great moments, but as a 142-minute film, it works more like a band for controversy and reflection. So: an important topic that is looking for the optimal film shape. For the Palme d'Or? An interesting, not entirely conventional choice. I appreciate the match I had with this. But I rank the previous two Ruben films higher.
()
An interesting film, a sharp criticism of modern Swedish society – we could even say Europe, actually – and even though it is about Art, which I don't really seek out, I surprisingly enjoyed myself and the film caught my attention. The film has some interesting ideas, memorable scenes – strange sex with Elisabeth Moss, threatening letters being thrown into mailboxes in an apartment building, and of course the crazy psycho scene where Terry Notary converts a monkey at a company party, which makes it stand out even at an above average rating). Story****, Action>No, Humor**, Violence>No, Entertainment****, Music***, Visuals****, Atmosphere****, Suspense***. 7/10.
()
Considering how highly this film is rated, I don't think I belong to its target audience. After all, I'm no intellectual who can see an art installation in a pile of construction material. Modern art is completely beyond me, so the long debates on the subject put me to sleep, and the shots without any plot (and there were quite a few) didn’t help much either. To make matters worse, the film suffers from political correctness. One star for the controversial clip, Oleg's primate and the hard-working cleaner.
()
This is a film about how easy it is to lose something and try to find it again. But above all, it is a film about what art is, how far it reaches, and what we can perceive as art. There are quite a few good questions asked here, either actually or metaphorically, that are definitely worth pondering. Art and madness are interchangeable.
()
Annonces